PARADISA MODS (
paradisamods) wrote in
paradisaooc2011-10-01 05:59 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
ACTIVITY CHECK DISCUSSION
Hey guys!
So there's been some confusion and disagreement about what should/should not count for activity check, what is counted where, etc. So this is a post where we'd like to discuss revamping the activity check system with you! Once we can get a clear idea of what everyone feels is fair, it will make it easier for us to have a clear system where everyone understands the activity requirements desired of each character in Paradisa.
SECTIONS:
What do you think should count for a post?
What should constitute thread "size"?
What should constitute comment "quality"?
How much should the mods be responsible for? The players?
How should a thread on a log be judged?
So there's been some confusion and disagreement about what should/should not count for activity check, what is counted where, etc. So this is a post where we'd like to discuss revamping the activity check system with you! Once we can get a clear idea of what everyone feels is fair, it will make it easier for us to have a clear system where everyone understands the activity requirements desired of each character in Paradisa.
SECTIONS:
What do you think should count for a post?
What should constitute thread "size"?
What should constitute comment "quality"?
How much should the mods be responsible for? The players?
How should a thread on a log be judged?
no subject
I think the difference is the prospective time a log could take. Will some people cheat the system? Yes. Will players be frustrated? Yes. But they can bring their concerns to the mod team if a specific player is skating by.
Asking you to regulate prose tags vs. actionspam tags and thread length and posting time and style of AC is a ridiculous amount to keep track of, a lot more work than the mod team should need to do, and too controlling of how players need to play.
I don't like character squatting either, but I feel like we're all getting a little too up in arms over it right now. I don't think we need a ton of restrictions. The Log posts generally counted as more because they (potentially) are more effort. That seems like a fair enough assessment to me.
no subject
Really, I'm just trying to understand the difference between activity on the main community versus activity on the logs community. Right now it seems (based on what I'm reading) that if you can't make a post or you can't reply to threads in the main community, all you need to do is reply to a thread on the logs community, place your character's tag on the entry, and call it a day.
I totally understand that in the past some activity checks have allowed this for whatever reason, but I'm curious as to why we all feel that it is acceptable activity.
no subject
Honestly, my main opinion on logs is based on the closed vs. open prospect.
An open log where anyone can tag in...I guess I don't see how that should be treated as different from a post in the comm.
But the closed logs feel more like joint posts. Even if one member is slow, I feel like that should count.
no subject
It's more the "Nepeta and YOU!" logs that I am confused with, as that is essentially like making an open post on the main community, just in third person.
no subject
Although her logs were originally listed as "Harmony and YOU" or whatever, we discussed them beforehand and I planned to tag into them when she posted them, so you can't always go off of lack of closed log for this type of thing.
no subject
no subject
I guarantee that part of the reason is that it's easier/faster/or more convenient.
no subject
To me, they are equal and should be treated as such. I don't think that one way of replying to someone should be considered any different than replying to another. Therefore, and this is just my personal opinion coming out, a thread in the logs community shouldn't count as a post if a thread in the main community doesn't.
no subject
no subject
no subject
1) Have players post their own activity each month to make less work for you and more accountability for us.
2) Stop monitoring everything so closely. I swear I have seen more charts in this place than anywhere else in my life.
3) If it's not broke, don't fix it. Leave the activity rules alone instead of making them more arbitrary/complicated.
4) If people are really that inactive or squatting, approach them. If castmates and CR are not coming to you guys to complain then what's the problem? Honestly.
Paradisa already has the most complicated activity check related stuff from any game I've ever been in. Deciding what counts over what and making more ways to track stuff just ... I can't see it helping at all. It should be straightforward as laid out for us countless times in the past when AC is brought up--a combination of two posts or participation in two logs or any combination. If people are dropping threads or abusing this system then step in. If you don't notice it and no one else cares enough to go to a mod about it then it's obviously not a problem.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It'd make it easier for everyone. +1 to this
no subject
no subject
And if you miss it for whatever reason, we've seen from previous ACs how other players are more than willing to go thread-hunting for people.