paradisamods: (Default)
PARADISA MODS ([personal profile] paradisamods) wrote in [community profile] paradisaooc2011-10-01 05:59 pm
Entry tags:

ACTIVITY CHECK DISCUSSION

Hey guys!

So there's been some confusion and disagreement about what should/should not count for activity check, what is counted where, etc. So this is a post where we'd like to discuss revamping the activity check system with you! Once we can get a clear idea of what everyone feels is fair, it will make it easier for us to have a clear system where everyone understands the activity requirements desired of each character in Paradisa.


SECTIONS:

What do you think should count for a post?
What should constitute thread "size"?
What should constitute comment "quality"?
How much should the mods be responsible for? The players?
How should a thread on a log be judged?

[identity profile] dusk.livejournal.com 2011-10-02 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, and I get that. It is a lot of policing, I agree. It's something that's intended to help you guys as players, but it sounds like from a lot of the comments here that everyone would rather we didn't and that we step off and let things roll as they roll.
neverplays: (Default)

[personal profile] neverplays 2011-10-02 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
I am all for you guys taking a look at those things, but maybe just when it's needed.

I mean, for a lack of better term it feels like a hit list being built up against people. While I know that's not the intent, it does seem to push toward that "We've got our eye on you." notion.

If there is concern, it's good to know that you can look back on a player's tag and you can use the advanced search to find out if a player is or isn't doing a lot -- and keeping track of the hiatuses away from the comm is good too -- but I just think it makes people feel like they are immediately put under some sort of pressure, even before they've missed the AC period.