paradisamods: (Default)
PARADISA MODS ([personal profile] paradisamods) wrote in [community profile] paradisaooc2011-10-01 05:59 pm
Entry tags:

ACTIVITY CHECK DISCUSSION

Hey guys!

So there's been some confusion and disagreement about what should/should not count for activity check, what is counted where, etc. So this is a post where we'd like to discuss revamping the activity check system with you! Once we can get a clear idea of what everyone feels is fair, it will make it easier for us to have a clear system where everyone understands the activity requirements desired of each character in Paradisa.


SECTIONS:

What do you think should count for a post?
What should constitute thread "size"?
What should constitute comment "quality"?
How much should the mods be responsible for? The players?
How should a thread on a log be judged?

[identity profile] saccharosium.livejournal.com 2011-10-01 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I wouldn't put any limits on a log. If a player comments three times into a log and those three comments have sustenance, quality, weight to them, it should be the same as a player who has 50+ one-liner comments in a single thread.

[identity profile] dusk.livejournal.com 2011-10-01 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I think this is bleeding a little into the sections asking about the quality and length of tags below, but can I ask what you'd use to qualify a comment as having quality/weight to them? And if those three comments don't have that (or don't have the qualifications that others agree on), what do you think we should do then?

[identity profile] saccharosium.livejournal.com 2011-10-01 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Honestly? Anything third-person to me is quality, because it is a lot of effort and time being put into those logs and their subsequent responses. I wouldn't count a thread with Cross calling Allen an idiot as quality or effort, because it just comes easy to me. Cross and Allen having to face each other and talk about their issues head on? That is effort to me. Of course this is my personal opinion of that type of thing, and someone else may have something different on that.

[identity profile] dusk.livejournal.com 2011-10-02 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Makes sense! And thank you for speaking up ♥

[identity profile] saccharosium.livejournal.com 2011-10-02 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
No problem. ♥





/sends some fried chicken and cake

[identity profile] dusk.livejournal.com 2011-10-02 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
/d-drools on ......